Revisiting New York Times v. Sullivan

On April 21, 2021, the Federalist Society’s Free Speech & Election Law Practice Group hosted a teleforum titled “Revisiting New York Times v. Sullivan.” The Supreme Court’s landmark decision in New York Times v. Sullivan came under scrutiny in a recent dissent by Judge Silberman of the DC Court of Appeals. Noted First Amendment scholars Glenn Reynolds and Floyd Adams weighed in on the discussion addressing whether or not the nearly sixty-year-old case should be revisited, and the impact of First Amendment driven defamation laws in the journalistic context and free public discourse.

Featuring:

– Prof. Glenn Reynolds, Beauchamp Brogan Distinguished Professor of Law, University of Tennessee College of Law

– Floyd Abrams, Senior Counsel, Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP

– Moderator: Erik Jaffe, Partner, Schaerr Jaffe LLP

* * * * *

As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker.

This article was gathered automatically by our news bot. We help YouTubers by driving traffic to them for free. The featured image in this article is the thumbnail of the embedded video.

Leave a Comment

Close
Share via
Copy link